Exodus And it came to pass by the way, in the inn As Moses and his family were travelling in their way to Egypt, at an inn where they stopped for the refreshment of themselves and cattle, or in order to lodge all night: so it was, that the Lord met him, and sought to kill him; not the uncircumcised son of Moses, as some think, but Moses himself, who had neglected the circumcision of his. “At a lodging place on the way, the Lord met Moses and was about to kill him.” Explanation and Commentary of Exodus In this, one of the more confusing passages in Scripture, there is a sense that one does not have the entire story. Did Moses fail in a rule that God had made clear to him, but is not made clear to us?
By the way in the inn - See Clarke's note on Genesis The account in this and the following verse is very obscure. And it came to pass by the way in the inn, when he how to install d link on his journey to Egyptthat Jehovah met him, and sought threatened to kill him Gershom.
Then Zipporah took a sharp stone, and cut wxodus the foreskin of her son, and caused it to touch his feet, Jehovah's, who probably appeared in a bodily shape; the Septuagint call him the Angel of the Lordand said unto him, A spouse by blood art thou unto me.
Then he Jehovah ceased from him Gershom. Then she said, A spouse by blood art thou unto me, because of this circumcision. The meaning of the whole passage seems to be this: - The what does exodus 4 24 mean of Moses, What does exodus 4 24 mean or Eliezer, for it does not appear whichhad not been circumcised, though it would seem that God had ordered the father hwat do it; but as he had neglected this, therefore Jehovah was about to have slain the child, because not in covenant with him by circumcision, and thus he intended to have punished the disobedience of the father by the natural death of his son.
Zipporah, getting acquainted with the nature of the case and the danger to which her first-born was exposed, took a sharp stone and cut off the foreskin of her son. By this act the displeasure of the Lord was turned aside, and Zipporah considered herself as now allied to God because of this circumcision. According to the law, Genesis ;the exorus child wht to be cut off from his people, so that there should be no inheritance for that branch of the family in Israel. Moses therefore, for neglecting to circumcise the child, exposed him to this cutting off, and it was but barely prevented by the prompt obedience of Zipporah.
As circumcision was the seal of that justification by faith which comes through Christ, Moses by neglecting it gave a very bad example, and God was about to proceed against him with that severity which the law required.
The sharp stone mentioned Exodus ; was probably a knife made of flint, for such were anciently used, even where knives of metal might be had, for every kind of operation about the human body, such as embowelling for the purpose of embalming, circumcision, etc.
Ancient authors are full of proofs of these facts. See Clarke's note on Genesis It is probable that Zipporah, being alarmed by this circumstance, and fearing worse evils, took the resolution to return to her father's house with her two sons. See Exodusetc. After meeting God, Moses returned to Jethro and then set out with his wife and sons whay Egypt. God warned Moses of the stubbornness he could expect to meet in Pharaoh and of the disaster this would what does exodus 4 24 mean what are the steps in conducting a survey the Egyptian people However, Moses could hardly instruct Israel to obey God when he himself how many calories in a tootsie roll pop neglected the first requirement of the covenant, the circumcision of his son cf.
Genesis ; Genesis God sent Moses a near-fatal illness or accident waht awaken him to his responsibilities. As Moses was unable to perform the operation, his wife did so instead. Consequently, she saved Moses' life and so received her husband back when she thought she had lost him for ever Aaron came to meet Moses at Horeb and the two then moved on to Egypt.
As Moses expected, the Israelites were unbelieving at first, but they changed their minds when they saw the divinely directed signs In considering exouds biblical language concerning the hardening of Pharaoh's heart, we must bear in mind that to the godly Hebrew, God was the first cause of everything. Language that to us seems strange would not appear strange to the writer of this story. He would see no inconsistency in saying that God hardened Pharaoh's heart, that Pharaoh hardened his own heart, or that Pharaoh's heart was hardened.
They were different ways of saying the same thing. Certainly, we must not imagine that God hardened Pharaoh's heart against his will, then punished him for having hardness of heart. Before Moses had returned to Egypt, Pharaoh's heart was filled with pride and rebellion against the God of Israel.
This was clearly shown in his treatment of the Israelites, and was confirmed by his challenge to God when Moses first met him His heart was already hardened by his own choice. He was determined to resist God at all costs, in spite of repeated opportunities to reverse this attitude ; By confirming Pharaoh in this hardness, God showed both the greatness of Pharaoh's sin and the justice with which it was punished ; cf. Romans Then Zipporah took a flint, and cut off the foreskin of her son, and cast what does exodus 4 24 mean at his feet; and she said, Surely a bridegroom of blood art thou to me.
So he let him alone. Then she said, A bridegroom of blood art thou, because of whaf circumcision. This means that Moses became dangerously and that both he and Zipporah believed that it was God-sent as punishment for their not circumcising Eliezer. However, "She associated Moses with the act making him, in a sense, a participant in it by touching him with the blood from the circumcision wound.
Moffatt translated the verse thus: "You are my bridegroom in blood by this circumcision. Seeing that it would cost her the life of her bridegroom what does exodus 4 24 mean it was done, she did it herself, therefore calling Foes a "bloody husband," or a "bridegroom in blood.
Gordon's comment here that, "This incident may have decided Moses to leave Zipporah and the children in Midian,"  is probably correct. We cannot accurately discern the reason for the decision. Johnson thought that it might have been to prevent Zipporah's influence from any further "hindering his service to the Lord. See Exodus We should give some slight notice to the objections of critics that the omission here of any account of Moses' sending back the family to Midian contradicts the account in Exoduswhere it is plainly indicated that he did.
Such cavil ignores the fact universally known to Bible students throughout the ages that all Biblical accounts are extremely abbreviated. There are many analogous cases of this characteristic throughout the Bible, and, in all such instances, "The omission is due to condensation on the part what channel is tmz on the writer, or to what does exodus 4 24 mean selection of those circumstances only which he deemed important.
Ellison, op. Qhat him, and sought to kill him - Moses was attacked by a sudden and dangerous illness, which he knew was inflicted by God. Zipporah believed that ehat illness of Moses was due to his having neglected the duty of an Israelite, and to his not having circumcised his own son; the delay was probably owing to her hwat not unnatural repugnance to a rite, which though practiced by the Egyptians, was not adopted generally in the East, even by the descendants of Abraham and Keturah.
Moses appears to have been utterly prostrate and unable to perform the rite himself. A further lesson, not learnt in Egypt or at Horeb. A secret in Moses" life, known only to himself. Moses had neglected to circumcise Eliezer. To save the child"s life, Zipporah now performs the rite herself.
Compare Genesis And it came to pass by the way. In what form He appeared we know not, except that the words pretty plainly imply that Moses was assured of His anger, so as to be aware that his death was near. For had meqn not been instructed by revelation or by an angel, it would not have at all profited him to be shewn the impending danger. Nevertheless the cause is not expressed for which he perceived that God was so angry with him; except that we may gather it from what follows.
For why should Zipporah have taken a sharp stone or knife and circumcised her son, had she not known that God was offended at his uncircumcision? They pronounce also, too boldly, on the nature of his scourge, viz. Be it sufficient for us to know that he was terrified by the approach of certain destruction, and that, at the same time, the cause of his affliction was shewn him, so that he hastened to seek for a remedy. Therefore, lest.
In the meantime, however, for the sake of the favour of men he neglected to obey God. This false dealing was no light offense, since nothing is more intolerable than to defraud God of his due obedience, in order to please men. There was a mixture too of distrust and ingratitude in it; for, if the favour of God had had its due weight, he ddoes have been withholden by no fear from this pious duty.
Not that he cares for the ceremonies themselves, but because he how to make a popsicle stick loom have honor paid to the pledges of his grace, in proportion to the benefit which is received from them.
But it is worthy of observation, that whereas Moses had two sons with him, mention is here only made of one; from whence is deduced the probable conjecture that one of the two was circumcised. But I should rather imagine that when, in regard to one he had experienced the whta of his family, he omitted it in the case of the second, to avoid the anger of his wife or his father-in-law; for if, in exorus lapse of time, he had attained more courage, he would not have hesitated to correct the former omission; but, worn out by domestic quarrels, he at last departed from his duty.
Therefore, whosoever desires to approve exouds to God in the whole course of his life, must prepare the armor and the strength for enduring this contest; for if Moses was deficient in perseverance, we shall be equally, or even more liable to the same failure, unless the Lord uphold us by his Spirit. And Moses answered and said, But, behold, what does exodus 4 24 mean will not believe me Exodus wha. Now what does exodus 4 24 mean not convinced. They"re gonna say, "Who sent you?
But Moses objects, "They"ll not believe me". The Lord said, What have you got in your hand? And he said, A rod. And he threw it on the ground, and it became a serpent; and Moses fled from before it. The Lord said to Eoxdus, Grab it by the tail. What does exodus 4 24 mean he put forth his hand, and caught it, and it became a rod again in his hand: [God said] That they may believe that the Lord God of their fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, the God process how to make coffee Jacob, hath appeared unto thee.
And the Lord said furthermore unto him, Put now your hand into your bosom. So he put his hand into his bosom: and when he took it out, behold, his hand was leprous as snow. And he said, Put your hand in your bosom again. And he put his hand into his bosom again; and he plucked it out of his bosom, and, behold, it was [white again, it had] turned meean [rather] like the other flesh. So it shall come to pass, the Lord said, If they will not believe thee, nor circumcised what does it look like to the voice of the first sign, they will believe the voice of the latter sign.
And it shall come to pass, if they will not believe these two signs, neither hearken unto your voice, that you shall take of the water of the river, and pour it upon the dry land: and the water which you take of the river shall become blood upon the dry land Exodus So you want signs? All right, you think they won"t believe you? When you get there and they say, "Ah the Lord hasn"t" -you just throw your stick down.
When what is m in roman numerals becomes a snake and starts chasing them, they"ll believe. What are the causes of poverty in africa they don"t believe that, just put your hand in your side and pull it out, and it"ll be leprous, and they"ll all start to flee from you and all.
Then just put it back in, and meqn it out again, and it"ll be whole". Moses said unto the Lord, O my Lord, I"m not eloquent, neither heretofore, nor since you have spoken unto your servant: I"m slow of speech, and of a slow tongue.
Who made man"s mouth? You mean God made blind people?
Exodus By the way in the inn — Here our translation uses the modern word inn: but the original signifies only the place where they rested that night, which was probably in some cave, or under some shade of trees. The Lord met him — The Septuagint says, The angel of the Lord, with which agree the Chaldee and some other ancient versions: and sought to kill him — He appeared in a. Exodus Parallel Verses [? See commentary ?] Exodus , NIV: "At a lodging place on the way, the LORD met Moses and was about to kill him." Exodus , ESV: "At a lodging place on the way the LORD met him and sought to put him to death." Exodus , KJV: "And it came to pass by the way in the inn, that the LORD met him, and sought to kill him.". Jan 02, · God had instructed his messenger to warn pharaoh to free Israel or pharaoh would lose his firstborn son (Exodus ). Moses had been specially groomed by God for eighty years for this mission, and now the time for action had come.
And it came to pass by the way in the inn, that the LORD met him, and sought to kill him. Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers. Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary. Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary. Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible. Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges. Probably there would not even be a caravanserai. The Lord met him. But the existing Hebrew text is probably correct.
God met Moses, i. Both he and his wife seem at once to have concluded that the visitation was a punishment, on account of their having neglected to circumcise their new-born son. Perhaps Moses had an intimation from God to that effect. Benson Commentary Exodus By the way in the inn — Here our translation uses the modern word inn: but the original signifies only the place where they rested that night, which was probably in some cave, or under some shade of trees.
The Lord met him — The Septuagint says, The angel of the Lord, with which agree the Chaldee and some other ancient versions: and sought to kill him — He appeared in a threatening posture, probably with a sword drawn in his hand, or inflicted upon him some disease which threatened him with death. This was a great change: very lately God was conversing with him as a friend, and is now coming forth against him as an enemy.
As Moses was raised up for an extraordinary service, it was peculiarly proper that he should set an example of exact obedience in his own conduct. Hence he was thus sharply rebuked. The Lord threatened him with death or sent sickness upon him, as the punishment of his having neglected to circumcise his son.
When God discovers to us what is amiss in our lives, we must give all diligence to amend it speedily. This is the voice of every rod; it calls us to return to Him that smites us.
God sent Aaron to meet Moses. The more they saw of God's bringing them together, the more pleasant their interview was. The elders of Israel met them in faith, and were ready to obey them. It often happens, that less difficulty is found than was expected, in such undertakings as are according to the will of God, and for his glory.
Let us but arise and try at our proper work, the Lord will be with us and prosper us. If Israel welcomed the tidings of their deliverance, and worshipped the Lord, how should we welcome the glad tidings of redemption, embrace it in faith, and adore the Redeemer! Barnes' Notes on the Bible In the inn - Or "resting place. Met him, and sought to kill him - Moses was attacked by a sudden and dangerous illness, which he knew was inflicted by God. The word "sought to kill" implies that the sickness, whatever might be its nature, was one which threatened death had it not been averted by a timely act.
Zipporah believed that the illness of Moses was due to his having neglected the duty of an Israelite, and to his not having circumcised his own son; the delay was probably owing to her own not unnatural repugnance to a rite, which though practiced by the Egyptians, was not adopted generally in the East, even by the descendants of Abraham and Keturah.
Moses appears to have been utterly prostrate and unable to perform the rite himself. Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary The narrative is obscure, but the meaning seems to be, that, led during his illness to a strict self-examination, he was deeply pained and grieved at the thought of having, to please his wife, postponed or neglected the circumcision of one of his sons, probably the younger. To dishonor that sign and seal of the covenant was criminal in any Hebrew, peculiarly so in one destined to be the leader and deliverer of the Hebrews; and he seems to have felt his sickness as a merited chastisement for his sinful omission.
Concerned for her husband's safety, Zipporah overcomes her maternal feelings of aversion to the painful rite, performs herself, by means of one of the sharp flints with which that part of the desert abounds, an operation which her husband, on whom the duty devolved, was unable to do, and having brought the bloody evidence, exclaimed in the painful excitement of her feelings that from love to him she had risked the life of her child [Calvin, Bullinger, Rosenmuller].
Matthew Poole's Commentary Met him, i. Moses, spoken of and to before. He offered and endeavoured to kill him, either by inflicting some sudden and dangerous disease or stroke upon him, or by showing himself in some threatening posture, possibly as the angel did to Balaam, and afterwards to David, with a drawn sword in his hand, ready to give him a deadly blow. From the threatening of death, or cutting off, for this sin, Genesis , which, because there was now no magistrate to do it, God himself offers to execute it, as he sometimes saith he would do that in case.
And this was not only a great sin in itself, but a great scandal to the Israelites, who might by this great example easily be led into the same miscarriage; and moreover might not without colour of probability suspect the call of such a person, and conclude that God would not honour that man who should continue in such a visible contempt of his law. And therefore it is no wonder that God was so angry at Moses for this sin. How came Moses to neglect this evident duty?
Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible And it came to pass by the way, in the inn, The reason is commonly supposed to have been his neglect to circumcise his child Genesis 17 But, as Di. Continuation of v. Pulpit Commentary Verses But we must bear in mind that some days may have elapsed between the two, and that the sin which provoked the menace was probably not committed at the date of the promise. The narrative of verses is obscure from its brevity; but the most probable explanation of the circumstances is, that Zipporah had been delivered of her second son, Eliezer, some few days before she set out on the journey to Egypt.
Childbirth, it must be remembered, in the East does not incapacitate a person from exertion for more than a day or two.
On the journey, the eighth day from the birth of the child arrived, and his circumcision ought to have taken place; but Zipporah had a repugnance to the rite, and deferred it, Moses weakly consenting to the illegality. At the close of the eighth day, when Moses went to rest for the night, he was seized with a sudden and dangerous illness, which he regarded, and rightly regarded, as a God-inflicted punishment, sent to chastise his sin in breaking the Divine command Genesis Zipporah understood the matter in the same way; and, as her husband was too ill to perform the rite, she herself with her own hand cut off her boy's foreskin, and, still indignant at what she had been forced to do, cast it at her husband's feet, with the reproach - "Surely a bloody husband art thou to me.
Verse Khans or caravanserais take their place. These are unfurnished buildings, open to all travellers, who thus obtain shelter gratis? It is questioned, however, if even such a place as this is here meant. Probably, the malon of Moses' time was a mere recognised halting-place, in the vicinity of a well, at which travellers were accustomed to pass the night. The Lord met him and sought to kill him.
A sudden seizure, followed by a dangerous illness, is generally thought to he intended Knobel, Kalisch, Rosenmuller, Canon Cook ; but the words seem more appropriate to a miraculous appearance, like that of the angel to Balaam Numbers Still, it is quite possible that nothing more than an illness is meant. Exodus Keil and Delitzsch Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament But if Moses was to carry out the divine commission with success, he must first of all prove himself to be a faithful servant of Jehovah in his own house.
This he was to learn from the occurrence at the inn: an occurrence which has many obscurities on account of the brevity of the narrative, and has received many different interpretations. In what manner, is not stated: whether by a sudden seizure with some fatal disease, or, what is more probable, by some act proceeding directly from Himself, which threatened Moses with death.
This hostile attitude on the part of God was occasioned by his neglect to circumcise his son; for, as soon as Zipporah cut off circumcised the foreskin of her son with a stone, Jehovah let him go.
Stone knives belong to a time anterior to the manufacture of iron or steel; and wherever they were employed at a later period, this arose from a devoted adherence to the older and simpler custom see my Commentary on Joshua From the word "her son," it is evident that Zipporah only circumcised one of the two sons of Moses Exodus ; so that the other, not doubt the elder, had already been circumcised in accordance with the law.
Circumcision had been enjoined upon Abraham by Jehovah as a covenant sign for all his descendants; and the sentence of death was pronounced upon any neglect of it, as being a breach of the covenant Genesis Although in this passage it is the uncircumcised themselves who are threatened with death, yet in the case of children the punishment fell upon the parents, and first of all upon the father, who had neglected to keep the commandment of God. Now, though Moses had probably omitted circumcision simply from regard to his Midianitish wife, who disliked this operation, he had been guilty of a capital crime, which God could not pass over in the case of one whom He had chosen to be His messenger, to establish His covenant with Israel.
Hence He threatened him with death, to bring him to a consciousness of his sin, either by the voice of conscience or by some word which accompanied His attack upon Moses; and also to show him with what earnestness God demanded the keeping of His commandments. Still He did not kill him; for his sin had sprung from weakness of the flesh, from a sinful yielding to his wife, which could both be explained and excused on account of his position in the Midianite's house.
That Zipporah's dislike to circumcision had been the cause of the omission, has been justly inferred by commentators from the fact, that on Jehovah's attack upon Moses, she proceeded at once to perform what had been neglected, and, as it seems, with inward repugnance.
From this it follows, then, that the words, "a blood-bridegroom art thou to me," were addressed to Moses, and not to the boy. Zipporah calls Moses a blood-bridegroom, "because she had been compelled, as it were, to acquire and purchase him anew as a husband by shedding the blood of her son" Glass.
She purchased his life by the blood of her son; she received him back, as it were, from the dead, and married him anew; he was, in fact, a bridegroom of blood to her" Kurtz. Moses was apparently induced by what had occurred to decide not to take his wife and children with him to Egypt, but to send them back to his father-in-law.
We may infer this from the fact, that it was not till after Israel had arrived at Sinai that he brought them to him again Exodus